Silent Steel Submarine Game For MacSilent Hunter 5 Battle of the Atlantic game update version v. EU Standard Edition Download. Game update patch to Silent Hunter 5 Battle of the Atlantic. A simulation, or sim, is a computer game that mimics every aspect of real life. Silent Hunter 4 places you inside a U. S. attack submarine smackdab in the middle. Why The U. S. Must Get Rid Of Its Land Based Nuclear Missiles. The Cold War is over. And so is the need for Americas land based Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Not only are the costs of maintaining 4. Submarine game forum. UBOOT is a WWII sim, yet different than all you have seen so far. It is a survival sandbox with game mechanics similar to that of Fallout. A WAR TO REMEMBER. In memory of the sailors lost on the USS Lagarto. Gulf of Siam, South China Sea, May 3, 1945. A Sailors Poem. Run silent, run deep. TlvTwK6s/hqdefault.jpg' alt='Silent Steel Submarine Games' title='Silent Steel Submarine Games' />Minuteman III missiles unsustainable, keeping them in the nuclear arsenal is hardly practical. Maintaining hundreds of outdated, budget draining Minuteman IIIs when the Pentagon has the more accurate, multi dimensional Trident II that can be shot from Ohio class submarines that are virtually undetectable makes little sense. Ssangyong Diagnostic Tool there. Its already estimated that modernizing Americas nuclear stockpile will cost taxpayers more than 1 trillion over 3. The U. S. Air Force wants to replace the current land based ICBM force with newer missiles that are estimated to cost more than 1. Defense Department set last summer. But scrapping the Minuteman III will not only save money, it will show Russia, and other emerging nuclear powers like India and Pakistan that America is serious about non proliferation. From both a financial, tactical and leadership standpoint, America and the rest of the world will be better off if Washington puts aside its political posturing and kill the land based leg of its nuclear triadthe land, air and sea based platforms America uses to launch its nuclear weapons. Donald Trump, who claims to be the best on the military among the 2. Presidential candidatesRead more Read. The idea would be met with fierce opposition, some of which would be understandable. Washington has long struggled to reign in North Koreas nuclear weapons program and Pyongyangs ICBM test on the Fourth of July wasnt encouraging. Former President Barack Obama was a vocal advocate of denuclearization early on in his presidency, but Congress never supported his efforts. Silent Steel Submarine Game Ps4' title='Silent Steel Submarine Game Ps4' />The Kremlin certainly didnt make Obamas efforts easier by modernizing its own nuclear weapons program and violating New START. Yesterdays North Korean missile launch, confirmed as an intercontinental ballistic missile ICBM, Read more Read. None of this is enough to justify keeping the Minuteman III stockpile. If the Trump administration approached nuclear defense with a sober, non partisan outlook, it would realize that land based ICBMs are nothing more than dated, hollow symbols of American security that dont offer the nuclear deterrent protection their advocates claim. Submarines All But Eliminate The Need For Land based ICBMs. One could argue that the U. S. should get rid of all its nukes, and indeed that would be the outcome in a perfect world. But until the United States and Russia negotiate a major nuclear weapons reduction, Washington still needs to maintain a powerful arsenal. Modernizing the weapons we do have is essential for maintenance issues alone. That said, America could get rid of many of them, starting with all of the Minuteman III silos located in Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming. On a functional level, there is nothing a Minuteman III can do that an Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile SLBM cant. If we compare the SLBM Trident II with the ICBM Minuteman III, it is fairly easy to see why keeping both makes little sense. The U. S. Navy currently has 1. Ohio class submarines in its fleet, 1. Trident IIs. One Trident has eight thermonuclear Multiple Independently Targetable Re entry Vehicles, each carrying a 1. Once fired, the Trident II would travel towards its target at speeds of 1. One silo of Trident IIs from one Ohio class sub could rain up to 1. A horrifying thought, but undoubtedly effective. Phillp Coyle, a Senior Science Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation, said that besides the Tridents better guidance system that improves accuracy, they are constantly being built and improved upon. If you give anyone in the military a choice between a Minuteman and a Trident, they would take the Trident, he said. To put the power of the Trident II in context, the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki one of which was ironically nicknamed the Little Boy had a yield of 1. TNT, according to Live Science. Lets say that President Donald Trump gives the OK to nuke Russia unlikely for various reasons, I know, but go with me here and the U. S. Navy fires every single missile from its Ohio class subs it would only take one minute to fire them. Moscow would have to figure out a way to stop the onslaught. The problem is that they couldnt. No one could. Moreover, the Ohio class subs carrying these civilization killers are almost impossible to detect unless they surface. In 2. 00. 9, the French submarine Triomphant and the United Kingdoms HMS Vanguard crashed into each other. Neither of the crews made a mistake. The cause was the advanced deep water submarine stealth technology, as The National Interest reports While an attack submarine is always on the lookout for other ships and submarines and often seeks to shadow those of foreign nations, a ballistic missile submarine just wants to be left alone and undetected under the ocean. Such submarines serve as a stealthy guarantor that any deadly attack on a home country could be reciprocated with a nuclear strike from a submarine launched ballistic missile launched from underwater. While a hypothetical aggressor might hope to take out a nations ground and air based nuclear forces with a preemptive strike, submarines concealed deep underwater across the globe would be impossible to reliably track down and destroyat least not all of them, and only as long as they dont broadcast their presence. However, one might think that two submarines passing close enough to scratch each others backs should be able to detect each others presence. However, modern subs have become very quiet, benefiting from tear drop shaped hulls, superior propellers and sound absorbing anechoic tiles, among other technologies. Theyre so hard to track, David Wright, Co Director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said. Other nations dont know where they are. And they can also launch their missiles from anywhere in the wide ocean whereas the ICBMs are fixed, well known sites that have been there for decades. Americas adversaries know exactly where they are and if they want to attack them with very large nuclear weapons, even though theyre in harden silos, they could do that and be sure of hitting them. So why the need for ICBMs if half of Americas nuclear arsenal can travel deep in the ocean virtually undetectedSome arms experts, like Tom Nichols and Dana Struckman, argue the deterrence effect of land based ICBMs is severely under estimated. In a co authored column in The National Interest last year, Struckman and Nichols argued that Minuteman IIIs are too valuable a deterrent to scrap Moreover, if the ICBM force were targeted, the United States would still be able to attack, with great speed and precision, not only the remaining enemy strategic force but important parts of enemy military infrastructure. Russia or China would then be the ones to face the fateful decision to attack cities, a situation they will inevitably bring on themselves the moment they initiate the conflictwhich is exactly the realization that should deter them in the first place. Its a fair point, but one that over estimates the Minuteman IIIs geopolitical importance. The argument also doesnt consider the rapid improvement of the Trident II thats designed to phase out land based ICBMs in the first place.